Open Scientific Practices Used by Researchers in Medical and Health Sciences in Colombia

Authors

Keywords:

open science practices, open science, open access to scientific knowledge, open scientific communication, research in medical and health sciences.

Abstract

Open scientific practices are constituted by a series of actions aimed at building a science in tune with social needs, considering horizontal perspectives that generate greater dialogue between science and society. In this sense, the general objective of this article is to analyze open scientific practices used by researchers in medical sciences and health in Colombia. The methodology consisted of a quantitative approach, supported by a structured questionnaire answered by 339 researchers in this area of knowledge. The main results aim to highlight that collaborative practices are not yet carried out daily in the area, but there are advances in open scientific knowledge practices especially related to publications and in open communication associated with visibility in the construction of the digital profile of investigator. In conclusion, it is evident that the scientists included in the study generally present a progressive tendency to use open science practices, but strategic components that guarantee the development of processes of social appropriation of knowledge in the area of health must be strengthened. Colombia and training and skill in the area.

Author Biographies

Ruth Helena Vallejo Sierra, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Bibliotecóloga y Archivista, Doctora en Documentación

Johann Enrique Pirela Morillo, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Bibliotecólogo y Archivólogo. Doctor en Ciencias Humanas

References

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OCDE]. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook. Times of Crisis and Opportunity, OECD Publishing, París. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/75f79015-en

World Economic Forum. ¿Can science be more equitable so that everyone enjoys the benefits? Open science is the answer. 2023 [acceso 13/01/2024]. Disponible en: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/02/science-has-a-social-justice-problem-we-need-open-science/

Besançon L, Peiffer-Smadja N, Segalas C, Jiang H, Masuzzo P, Smout C, et al. La ciencia abierta salva vidas: lecciones de la pandemia de COVID-19. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21:117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y

Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks C, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler J, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015;348:1422-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374

Munafò M, Nosek B, Bishop D, Button D, Chambers Ch, Percie du Sert N, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2017;1:21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021

Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Magalhães T. The Inherent Drawbacks of the Pressure to Publish in Health Sciences: Good or Bad Science. 2015;4:419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6809.1

Smaldino PE, Turner Matthew A, Contreras Kallens PA. Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190194

Dominik M, Nzweundji JG, Ahmed N, Carnicelli S, Mat Jalaluddin NS, Fernandez Rivas D, et al. Open Science-For Whom? Data Science Journal. 2022;21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-001

Besançon L, Peiffer-Smadja N, Segalas C, Jiang H, Masuzzo P, Cooper S, et al. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21:117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y

Vallejo-Sierra R, Pirela-Morillo J. Investigadores abiertos. Prácticas para la transparencia e integridad científica. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud. 2022 [acceso 12/06/2023];33. Disponible en: https://acimed.sld.cu/index.php/acimed/article/view/1852

Nathan M, Lee N. Cultural diversity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Firm-level evidence from London. Econ. Geogr. 2013 [acceso 12/06/2023];89:367-94. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259548515_Cultural_Diversity_Innovation_and_Entrepreneurship_Firm-level_Evidence_from_London

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación [Minciencias]. Resolución 777 por la cual se adopta la política Nacional de Ciencia Abierta 2022-2031. 2022 [acceso 12/06/2023]. Disponible en: https://minciencias.gov.co/pdf/pdfreader?url=https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/politica_nacional_de_ciencia_abierta_-2022_-_version_aprobada.pdf

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e innovación. Política de ética, bioética e integridad científica. 2017 [acceso 12/06/2023]. Disponible en: https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/noticias/politica-etica.pdf

Murphy MC, Mejia AF, Mejia J, Yan X, Cheryan S, Dasgupta N, et al. Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(39):24154-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921320117.

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e innovación. Política de ética, bioética e integridad científica. 2017 [acceso 12/06/2023]. Disponible en: https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/noticias/politica-etica.pdf

Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological. Science. 2015;349(6251). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Published

2024-12-03

How to Cite

1.
Vallejo Sierra RH, Pirela Morillo JE. Open Scientific Practices Used by Researchers in Medical and Health Sciences in Colombia. Rev. cuba. inf. cienc. salud [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 3 [cited 2024 Dec. 25];35. Available from: https://acimed.sld.cu/index.php/acimed/article/view/2676

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales