Lack of standards in evaluating YouTube health videos
Abstract
This paper is a systematised literature review of YouTube research in health with the aim of identify the different keyword search strategies, retrieval strategies and scoring systems to assess video content. A total of 176 peer-reviewed papers about video content analysis and video evaluation were extracted from the PubMed database. Concerning keyword search strategy, 16 papers (9.09 %) reported that search terms were obtained from tools like Google Trends or other sources. In just one paper, a librarian was included in the research team. Manual retrieval is a common technique, and just four studies (2.27 %) reported using a different methodology. Manual retrieval also produces YouTube algorithm dependencies and consequently obtains biased results. Most other methodologies to analyse video content are based on written medical guidelines instead of video because a standard methodology is lacking. For several reasons, reliability cannot be verified. In addition, because studies cannot be repeated, the results cannot be verified and compared. This paper reports some guidelines to improve research on YouTube, including guidelines to avoid YouTube dependencies and scoring system issues.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Aquellos autores que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un repositorio institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en repositorios institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto). En ese caso, solicitamos que en la cabecera del manuscrito se indique:"Esta es una versión preprint enviada a la Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud http://rcics.sld.cu/"
ENGLISH VERSION
AUTHORS WITH PUBLICATIONS IN THIS JOURNAL ACCEPT THE FOLLOWING TERMS:
- Authors will retain their copyright and will grant the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will also be subject to a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) allowing third parties to share the work as long as the author's name and data about initial publication in this Journal are stated.
- Authors may adopt other license agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published (e.g. deposit it in an institutional repository or publish it in a monographic volume), as long as initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
- It is permitted and recommended for authors to disseminate their work on the Internet (e.g. in institutional repositories or their web page) before and during the submission process, which may result in interesting exchanges and increase the number of citations of the published work) (see The effect of open access).
