Top 100 Most-Cited Papers in Substance Abuse: A Bibliometric Analysis and Evidence Mapping
Palabras clave:
substance abuse, bibliometrics, data science, impact factor.Resumen
The citations of an article reflect its impact, recognition and influence in the scientific and professional community, as well as providing a way of understanding the socio-organisational structure, in this case of the area of substance abuse research. The objective is to analyse the 100 most cited articles in the Web of Science, which have been published in journals in the Substance Abuse category of the Journal Citation Reports. The methods applied are retrospective bibliometric analysis and scientific mapping. Forty journals were identified in the category "Substance Abuse". A WOS search was conducted and the 100 most cited articles were selected. Title, authors, institutions, countries, year and citations were extracted from WoS. JCR impact factor, citation density, immediacy index, quartile and country were calculated. Citation density and Bradford's law were calculated, and studies were classified according to their design and topic. All studies analysed are citation classics published over 40 years, and the most recent ones were the most cited. The most frequent design was review, while longitudinal and randomised control studies were rare. In terms of subject matter, substance assessment and diagnosis dominated, with little representation of behavioural addictions. Authors from all five continents participated, and the majority were from the United States. Most of the studies were published in four journals with a higher average impact factor than others in related areas. There is a clear tendency to cite reviews, evaluations and diagnostic studies related to substance abuse.
Citas
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2020. UNODC. 2020 [access 31/06/2023]. Available from: https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2020/index.html
Zou Y, Luo Y, Zhang J, Xia N, Tan G, Huang C. Bibliometric analysis of oncolytic virus research, 2000 to 2018. Med. 2019;98(35):e16817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016817
Wu Y, Zhao Y, Lin L, Lu Z, Guo Z, Li X, et al. Fifty top-cited spine articles from mainland China: A citation analysis. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(2):773-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060517713804
Wong ELY, Tam WWS, Wong FCY, Cheung AWL. Citation classics in nursing journals: The top 50 most frequently cited articles from 1956 to 2011. Nurs Res. 2013;62(5):344-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182a2adff
Huo Y, Pan X, Li Q, Wang X, Jiao X, Jia Z, et al. Fifty top-cited classic papers in orthopedic elbow surgery: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;18:28-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.020
Pagni M, Khan NR, Cohen HL, Choudhri AF. Highly cited works in radiology: The top 100 cited articles in radiologic journals. Acad Radiol. 2014;21(8):1056-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.03.011
Bradford S. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly Journal. 1934;137:85-6.
Brookes BC. Bradfords law and bibliography of science. Nature. 1969;224(5223):953-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/224953a0
IBM CR 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk: NY; 2019.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Annalingam A, Damayanthi H, Jayawardena R, Ranasinghe P. Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country. SpingerPlus. 2014;3(140). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-140
Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool for science policy studies. Sci Mag. 1972;3:471-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
Garfield E. What is a Citation Classic? 2009 [access 20/06/2023]. Available from: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics.html
Jiang Y, Hu R, Zhu G. Top 100 cited articles on infection in orthopaedics A bibliometric analysis. Med. 2019;98(2):e14067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014067
Uthman OA, Okwundu CI, Wiysonge CS, Young T, Clarke A. Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Who wrote the top 100 most cited articles? PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078517
Martín-Del-Río B, Solanes-Puchol A, Martínez-Zaragoza F, Benavides-Gil G. Stress in nurses: The 100 top-cited papers published in nursing journals. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(7):1488-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13566
Joyce KM, Joyce CW, Kelly JC, Kelly JL, Carroll SM. Levels of evidence in the plastic surgery literature: A citation analysis of the top 50 “classic” papers. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(4):411-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.411
Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS. 1988;79(299):606-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/354848
Glasner-Edwards S, Rawson R. Evidence-based practices in addiction treatment: Review and recommendations for public policy. Health Policy Educ. 2010;97(2-3):93-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.013
Van Noorden R, Maher B, Nuzzo R. The Top 100 papers. Nature. 2014;514(7524):550-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/514550a
Lipsman N, Lozano AM. The most cited works in major depression: The “Citation classics.” J Affect Disord. 2011;134(1-3):39-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.031
Kesmodel US. Cross-sectional studies-what are they good for? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(4):388-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13331
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. In: 5th ed. Washington, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
Pedrero Pérez EJ, Rodríguez Monje MT, de Leon JM. Mobile phone abuse or addiction. A review of the literature. Adicciones. 2012 [access 12/04/2023];24(2):139-52. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=289122912007
EShuaib W, Khan MS, Shahid H, Valdes EA, Alweis R. Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited cardiovascular articles. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(7):972-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.029
Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 [access 12/04/2023];78(4):376-82. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC225441/pdf/mlab00125-0058.pdf
Link AM. US and Non-US submissions. An analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280(3):246-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.246
WestE R, McIlwaine A. What do citation counts count for in the field of addiction? An empirical evaluation of citation counts and their link with peer ratings of quality. Addiction. 2002;97(5):501-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00104.x
Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2002;287(21):2847-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2847
Jones AW. The impact of alcohol and alcoholism among substance abuse journals. Alcohol. 1999;34(1):25-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/34.1.25
Cavalcanti DC, Prudêncio RB, Pradhan SS, Shah JY, Pietrobon RS. Good to be bad? Distinguishing between positive and negative citations in scientific impact. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Computer Society; 2011:156-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2011.32
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Aquellos autores que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un repositorio institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en repositorios institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto). En ese caso, solicitamos que en la cabecera del manuscrito se indique:"Esta es una versión preprint enviada a la Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud http://rcics.sld.cu/"
ENGLISH VERSION
AUTHORS WITH PUBLICATIONS IN THIS JOURNAL ACCEPT THE FOLLOWING TERMS:
- Authors will retain their copyright and will grant the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will also be subject to a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) allowing third parties to share the work as long as the author's name and data about initial publication in this Journal are stated.
- Authors may adopt other license agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published (e.g. deposit it in an institutional repository or publish it in a monographic volume), as long as initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
- It is permitted and recommended for authors to disseminate their work on the Internet (e.g. in institutional repositories or their web page) before and during the submission process, which may result in interesting exchanges and increase the number of citations of the published work) (see The effect of open access).